Ausführlicher Leitfaden kommt bald
Wir arbeiten an einem umfassenden Bildungsleitfaden für den Burnout Inventory Calculator. Schauen Sie bald wieder vorbei für Schritt-für-Schritt-Erklärungen, Formeln, Praxisbeispiele und Expertentipps.
The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) Score Calculator measures occupational burnout across three distinct dimensions using 22 items rated on a 0-to-6 frequency scale. Developed by Christina Maslach and Susan Jackson at the University of California, Berkeley in 1981, the MBI is the most extensively used and validated burnout assessment instrument, employed in over 90 percent of all published burnout research. It has been cited more than 50,000 times and translated into over 25 languages. The MBI assesses three independent dimensions of burnout that should never be combined into a single total score. Emotional Exhaustion (EE, 9 items) measures feelings of being emotionally overextended and depleted of emotional resources. Depersonalization (DP, 5 items) measures unfeeling and impersonal responses toward the recipients of one service or care. Personal Accomplishment (PA, 8 items) measures feelings of competence and successful achievement in one work with people. High burnout is characterized by high EE, high DP, and low PA scores. Burnout was officially recognized by the World Health Organization in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) as an occupational phenomenon resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed. The ICD-11 definition explicitly maps to the three MBI dimensions: feelings of energy depletion or exhaustion (EE), increased mental distance from one job or feelings of negativism or cynicism related to one job (DP), and reduced professional efficacy (PA). The MBI is used by occupational health psychologists for employee assessment, healthcare systems monitoring provider burnout, organizations conducting workforce wellbeing surveys, researchers studying the antecedents and consequences of burnout, and individual professionals seeking to quantify their burnout experience. Given that burnout affects an estimated 67 percent of all workers at some point in their careers and costs the global economy an estimated $322 billion annually in turnover, absenteeism, and reduced productivity, accurate measurement is essential for both individual and organizational intervention.
Emotional Exhaustion (EE) = sum of items 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 13, 14, 16, 20 (range 0-54) Depersonalization (DP) = sum of items 5, 10, 11, 15, 22 (range 0-30) Personal Accomplishment (PA) = sum of items 4, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21 (range 0-48) High Burnout: EE >= 27, DP >= 10, PA <= 33 Moderate Burnout: EE 17-26, DP 7-9, PA 34-39 Low Burnout: EE <= 16, DP <= 6, PA >= 40 IMPORTANT: Do NOT sum EE + DP + PA into a single total. The three subscales are independent. Worked Example: EE items: 5+4+6+3+5+4+6+3+5 = 41 (HIGH - severe exhaustion) DP items: 4+3+2+3+4 = 16 (HIGH - significant depersonalization) PA items: 3+2+4+3+2+3+2+4 = 23 (LOW - reduced accomplishment) Profile: High EE, High DP, Low PA = Full Burnout Syndrome
- 1Complete all 22 items by rating how often you experience each feeling or attitude using a 7-point frequency scale: 0 (never), 1 (a few times a year), 2 (once a month), 3 (a few times a month), 4 (once a week), 5 (a few times a week), 6 (every day). It is essential to respond based on your actual experience rather than how you think you should feel. Items cover a range of work-related emotional experiences from feeling emotionally drained and fatigued to feeling energized and accomplished.
- 2The calculator assigns each item to its designated subscale. Emotional Exhaustion items assess energy depletion, feeling used up, morning dread, strain from working with people, and feeling at the end of one rope. Depersonalization items assess treating recipients as impersonal objects, becoming hardened emotionally, not caring about what happens to some recipients, and feeling blamed by recipients. Personal Accomplishment items assess feeling exhilarated after working closely with recipients, accomplishing worthwhile things, dealing with emotional problems calmly, and positively influencing lives.
- 3Each subscale is scored independently by summing the item responses within that subscale. Emotional Exhaustion ranges from 0 to 54, Depersonalization from 0 to 30, and Personal Accomplishment from 0 to 48. The subscales are intentionally kept separate because burnout is a multidimensional syndrome, and collapsing the three dimensions into a single score obscures clinically important variation in burnout profiles. An individual with high EE but normal DP and PA requires different intervention than one with high DP but moderate EE.
- 4Each subscale score is classified into low, moderate, or high severity categories using the published cutoffs derived from normative samples. For Emotional Exhaustion: 0-16 is low, 17-26 is moderate, 27-54 is high. For Depersonalization: 0-6 is low, 7-9 is moderate, 10-30 is high. For Personal Accomplishment: 40-48 is high accomplishment (low burnout), 34-39 is moderate, 0-33 is low accomplishment (high burnout). Note that the PA scale is reverse-directional: lower scores indicate worse burnout.
- 5The calculator generates a burnout profile by combining the three subscale classifications. Full burnout syndrome is defined as high EE AND high DP AND low PA simultaneously, which represents the most severe presentation. Partial burnout patterns (such as high EE with normal DP and PA, or high DP alone) identify individuals at risk for progression to full burnout if contributing factors are not addressed. The profile approach provides more clinically useful information than any single-number summary.
- 6Compare your subscale scores to occupation-specific norms. Burnout prevalence varies dramatically by profession: healthcare workers, educators, social workers, and first responders consistently show higher mean scores than the general working population. The calculator provides normative comparison data for over 20 occupational categories, enabling individuals to understand whether their scores are typical or elevated relative to their professional peers.
- 7Review the targeted intervention recommendations based on your burnout profile. High EE without high DP suggests the need for workload management, stress reduction, and recovery practices. High DP without high EE suggests the need for reconnecting with professional purpose, empathy restoration, and addressing cynicism. Low PA with adequate EE and DP suggests the need for professional development, recognition, and meaningful goal setting. Full burnout syndrome requires comprehensive intervention addressing all three dimensions simultaneously, often including organizational-level changes.
This nurse shows severe emotional exhaustion (46 out of 54) while maintaining moderate depersonalization and personal accomplishment. This profile is characteristic of early to mid-stage burnout where the nurse still cares about patients (moderate DP) and feels moderately competent (moderate PA) but is profoundly energy-depleted. Without intervention, the typical trajectory is for DP to increase and PA to decrease over the following 6-12 months. Priority intervention is workload reduction, improved recovery time, and organizational support for emotional processing.
All three subscales are in the burnout range, indicating full burnout syndrome. This teacher is emotionally exhausted (EE=44), has developed cynical attitudes toward students (DP=19), and no longer feels effective or accomplished in the role (PA=16). This represents the most severe burnout profile and is associated with high risk of leaving the profession (50 percent probability within 2 years), depression (3x elevated risk), and physical health deterioration. Comprehensive intervention including extended leave, psychotherapy, organizational change, and career counseling is recommended.
This engineer shows no significant burnout on any dimension, with low exhaustion, minimal depersonalization, and strong feelings of professional accomplishment. This profile is characteristic of engaged, thriving professionals who find their work meaningful and manageable. Maintenance strategies include protecting current work-life boundaries, continuing professional growth activities, and monitoring for early signs of increasing exhaustion during high-demand periods.
Healthcare systems use the MBI to monitor physician and nurse burnout, which affects an estimated 40-60 percent of US physicians and is a leading cause of medical errors, patient safety incidents, and physician suicide. The National Academy of Medicine has made clinician burnout a national priority, and many health systems now conduct annual MBI assessments of all clinical staff, using the results to guide organizational interventions such as workload optimization, peer support programs, and workflow redesign.
Schools and universities administer the MBI Educators Survey (MBI-ES) to teachers and faculty, documenting that educators experience burnout at rates of 30-50 percent nationally. Teacher burnout is a primary driver of the chronic teacher shortage, with burned-out teachers leaving the profession at twice the rate of non-burned-out colleagues. School districts use MBI data to evaluate the impact of class size reductions, administrative support changes, and professional development programs on teacher wellbeing.
Corporations use the MBI General Survey (MBI-GS) as part of their annual employee engagement assessment. Unlike engagement surveys that measure positive states, the MBI captures the pathological end of the engagement spectrum and identifies individuals and teams at risk of turnover, disability claims, and reduced productivity. Organizations with systematically high burnout scores face 2.6 times higher turnover rates and 37 percent higher absenteeism (Gallup data).
Researchers use the MBI as the primary dependent variable in studies of burnout antecedents, moderators, and outcomes. The six Areas of Worklife model (Maslach and Leiter) identifies workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values as the key organizational factors that predict MBI scores. Interventions targeting these areas (particularly workload and control) produce the largest MBI improvements.
The MBI-HSS (Human Services Survey) is designed for healthcare, social work,
The MBI-HSS (Human Services Survey) is designed for healthcare, social work, and education professionals who work directly with service recipients. The MBI-GS (General Survey) adapts the framework for all occupational settings by replacing recipient-focused items with work-focused items and renaming Depersonalization as Cynicism and Personal Accomplishment as Professional Efficacy. Organizations should use the version appropriate to their workforce to ensure valid normative comparisons.
Remote workers may show atypical MBI profiles compared to in-office workers.
Research conducted since 2020 suggests that remote workers show lower Depersonalization scores (less cynicism toward recipients due to reduced direct contact) but equivalent or higher Emotional Exhaustion (boundary blurring, longer hours, isolation). This shifting profile means that traditional burnout interventions focused on client-facing cynicism may be less relevant for remote workers, who need interventions targeting energy management, social connection, and work-life boundary establishment.
Burnout in medical residents and trainees presents a unique ethical challenge
Burnout in medical residents and trainees presents a unique ethical challenge because reporting high burnout scores may be perceived as weakness or lead to concerns about fitness for duty. Anonymized administration with aggregate reporting is essential in training environments. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) now requires residency programs to monitor and address trainee burnout as part of the institutional learning environment.
| Subscale | Low Burnout | Moderate | High Burnout | Healthcare Mean | Teacher Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional Exhaustion (0-54) | 0-16 | 17-26 | 27+ | 24.3 | 21.8 |
| Depersonalization (0-30) | 0-6 | 7-9 | 10+ | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Personal Accomplishment (0-48) | 40+ (good) | 34-39 | 0-33 (burnout) | 36.5 | 33.5 |
Can I combine the three subscale scores into one total?
No. The MBI manual explicitly states that the three subscale scores should not be combined into a single total. The dimensions are conceptually and empirically distinct, and combining them obscures important clinical information. An individual can have high emotional exhaustion with low depersonalization (characteristic of early-stage burnout) or high depersonalization with moderate exhaustion (characteristic of cynicism-dominant burnout). Report all three subscale scores separately.
What is the difference between stress and burnout?
Stress is a normal physiological and psychological response to demands that can be positive (eustress) or negative (distress) and typically resolves when the demand is removed. Burnout is a chronic syndrome that develops from prolonged unresolved workplace stress and is characterized by three specific features: exhaustion, cynicism/depersonalization, and reduced efficacy. Stress is about too much (too many demands), while burnout is about not enough (not enough energy, not enough caring, not enough accomplishment). A person can be stressed without being burned out, but burnout invariably involves chronic stress.
How does burnout differ from depression?
Burnout and depression share overlapping symptoms (fatigue, reduced motivation, negative thinking) but differ in key ways. Burnout is context-specific to the work domain; individuals with burnout often function well in non-work areas of life. Depression is pervasive, affecting all areas of functioning. Burnout improves with vacation or job change; depression typically does not. However, severe burnout can precipitate clinical depression, and the two conditions frequently co-occur. If burnout symptoms extend beyond the work domain or are accompanied by hopelessness, worthlessness, or suicidal ideation, evaluation for comorbid depression is essential.
How long does it take to recover from burnout?
Recovery time depends on severity and the scope of intervention. Mild burnout (one subscale elevated) may improve within 4-8 weeks with workload adjustment and stress management. Moderate burnout (two subscales elevated) typically requires 3-6 months of sustained change including reduced work hours, improved boundaries, and often professional support. Full burnout syndrome may require 6-18 months of comprehensive intervention including extended leave, psychotherapy, organizational change, and in some cases career transition. Research shows that burnout recovery is slower than development: it takes approximately twice as long to recover from burnout as it took to develop.
Is the MBI free to use?
No. Unlike the PSS and many other psychological measures, the MBI is a proprietary instrument published by Mind Garden, Inc. Licenses are required for both clinical and research use, with pricing starting at approximately $2.50 per administration. This licensing requirement has led to the development of alternative open-access burnout measures such as the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), which are freely available. However, the MBI remains the gold standard with the most extensive normative data and validation evidence.
Profi-Tipp
If your Emotional Exhaustion score is high but Depersonalization and Personal Accomplishment are still in the normal range, you are in the early stages of burnout and have the best opportunity for prevention. The single most effective intervention at this stage is protecting and expanding recovery time: take all available vacation days, establish a firm end-of-workday boundary, ensure at least two full days per week with no work engagement, and prioritize sleep. Research shows that sustained recovery (not just occasional breaks) is necessary to reverse the physiological and psychological effects of chronic exhaustion.
Wussten Sie?
Christina Maslach, co-developer of the MBI, originally began studying burnout not as a psychologist but while investigating how people cope with emotional arousal. She noticed that poverty lawyers, social workers, and healthcare providers developed remarkably similar patterns of exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy, which she initially described as burnout using the slang term common among free clinic workers in the 1970s. The MBI, published in 1981, transformed burnout from a colloquial expression into a rigorously measured psychological construct and launched a research field that has produced over 20,000 peer-reviewed publications.