詳細ガイド 近日公開
Renal Failure Indexの包括的な教育ガイドを準備中です。ステップバイステップの解説、数式、実例、専門家のヒントをお届けしますので、もうしばらくお待ちください。
The Renal Failure Index (RFI) is a urinary diagnostic index used to differentiate pre-renal azotaemia from intrinsic renal failure — most notably acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Like the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), it exploits the different handling of sodium and creatinine between pre-renal and intrinsic renal states. In pre-renal azotaemia, the tubules remain functionally intact and avidly reabsorb sodium, concentrating the urine while excreting little sodium. In ATN, tubular function is disrupted and sodium is wasted, resulting in a higher urinary sodium relative to creatinine clearance. The RFI is mathematically related to FENa: RFI = FENa × (Plasma Na / 100), meaning that numerically, RFI and FENa yield very similar values and are interpreted with the same thresholds. An RFI below 1 indicates preserved tubular function consistent with pre-renal azotaemia; an RFI above 1 suggests tubular dysfunction consistent with ATN. The RFI was developed in the 1970s and is now less frequently used in clinical practice compared with FENa, which is better established in literature and teaching. However, the RFI is occasionally referenced in older textbooks and some international nephrology guidelines, making familiarity with it still relevant. The same important limitations that affect FENa also affect the RFI: it is unreliable in patients who have received diuretics, in contrast nephropathy, acute glomerulonephritis, myoglobinuria, and haemoglobinuria — all of which can produce ATN with paradoxically low RFI values mimicking pre-renal disease.
Renal Failure Index Calculation: Step 1: Collect a spot urine sample before any diuretics are administered. Obtain a simultaneous serum (plasma) creatinine. Step 2: Measure urine sodium (UNa) in mmol/L, urine creatinine (UCr) in mg/dL, and plasma creatinine (PCr) in mg/dL. Step 3: Calculate the urine-to-plasma creatinine ratio: UCr/PCr. This is a surrogate for urine concentrating ability — a high ratio indicates concentrated urine, a low ratio indicates dilute urine. Step 4: Divide urine sodium by the UCr/PCr ratio: RFI = UNa / (UCr/PCr). Step 5: Interpret: RFI <1 = pre-renal (tubules intact, sodium avid reabsorption, concentrated urine); RFI >1 = intrinsic renal failure / ATN (tubules damaged, sodium wasted, urine poorly concentrated). Step 6: Note that RFI is mathematically equivalent to FENa × (Plasma Na / 100) — the two indices convey identical diagnostic information; FENa is generally preferred. Step 7: Always integrate with clinical context: oliguria duration, exposure to nephrotoxins, urine microscopy (granular casts = ATN), and volume status assessment. Each step builds on the previous, combining the component calculations into a comprehensive renal failure index result. The formula captures the mathematical relationships governing renal failure index behavior.
- 1Collect a spot urine sample before any diuretics are administered. Obtain a simultaneous serum (plasma) creatinine.
- 2Measure urine sodium (UNa) in mmol/L, urine creatinine (UCr) in mg/dL, and plasma creatinine (PCr) in mg/dL.
- 3Calculate the urine-to-plasma creatinine ratio: UCr/PCr. This is a surrogate for urine concentrating ability — a high ratio indicates concentrated urine, a low ratio indicates dilute urine.
- 4Divide urine sodium by the UCr/PCr ratio: RFI = UNa / (UCr/PCr).
- 5Interpret: RFI <1 = pre-renal (tubules intact, sodium avid reabsorption, concentrated urine); RFI >1 = intrinsic renal failure / ATN (tubules damaged, sodium wasted, urine poorly concentrated).
- 6Note that RFI is mathematically equivalent to FENa × (Plasma Na / 100) — the two indices convey identical diagnostic information; FENa is generally preferred.
- 7Always integrate with clinical context: oliguria duration, exposure to nephrotoxins, urine microscopy (granular casts = ATN), and volume status assessment.
RFI well below 1 confirms intact tubular function and pre-renal aetiology.
Intact tubules are avidly reabsorbing sodium (UNa only 12 mmol/L) while concentrating creatinine maximally (UCr/PCr ratio = 85.7). This pattern is consistent with hypovolaemia. IV fluid resuscitation should normalise creatinine within 24–48 hours.
RFI far above 1 with high UNa and poorly concentrated urine confirms ATN.
Tubular cells are necrotic, unable to reabsorb sodium (UNa 65 mmol/L) or concentrate urine (UCr/PCr only 8.9). Renal replacement therapy may be required. Urine microscopy would be expected to show muddy brown granular casts.
Contrast nephropathy causes ATN but can present with paradoxically low RFI — a well-known limitation.
In contrast nephropathy, intense renal vasoconstriction and preserved tubular sodium transport early in the process can yield a low RFI despite genuine tubular injury. Clinical context (recent contrast exposure, urine microscopy) overrides the RFI value here.
Furosemide forces sodium excretion regardless of tubular integrity; RFI is not interpretable.
Diuretics block sodium reabsorption in the loop of Henle, artificially elevating urine sodium and raising the RFI even in pre-renal states. In this scenario, the fractional excretion of urea (FEUrea) is a better test, as urea reabsorption is not blocked by diuretics.
Emergency nephrology: rapid bedside assessment of AKI aetiology in patients presenting with oliguria, elevated creatinine, and no prior diuretic exposure., representing an important application area for the Renal Failure Index in professional and analytical contexts where accurate renal failure index calculations directly support informed decision-making, strategic planning, and performance optimization
Critical care: distinguishing sepsis-related ATN from pre-renal azotaemia due to fluid shifts in multi-organ failure, to guide fluid administration decisions., representing an important application area for the Renal Failure Index in professional and analytical contexts where accurate renal failure index calculations directly support informed decision-making, strategic planning, and performance optimization
Hepatology wards: used alongside clinical criteria to screen for hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients with AKI, where a low RFI is an expected finding., representing an important application area for the Renal Failure Index in professional and analytical contexts where accurate renal failure index calculations directly support informed decision-making, strategic planning, and performance optimization
Medical education: RFI is taught alongside FENa and FEUrea to provide students with a systematic framework for AKI evaluation using urinary diagnostic indices., representing an important application area for the Renal Failure Index in professional and analytical contexts where accurate renal failure index calculations directly support informed decision-making, strategic planning, and performance optimization
Academic researchers and university faculty use the Renal Failure Index for empirical studies, thesis research, and peer-reviewed publications requiring rigorous quantitative renal failure index analysis across controlled experimental conditions and comparative studies
Hepatorenal Syndrome
{'title': 'Hepatorenal Syndrome', 'body': 'Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a form of functional AKI in advanced liver disease. Despite being a severe form of renal failure, the kidneys are structurally intact and tubules function normally — avid sodium reabsorption occurs due to extreme activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The RFI and FENa are typically <1 in HRS, mimicking pre-renal disease. This is why HRS kidneys can function normally when transplanted into a non-cirrhotic recipient. Treatment involves vasoconstrictors (terlipressin) and albumin, not dialysis, in early HRS.'}
Myoglobinuric ATN (Rhabdomyolysis)
{'title': 'Myoglobinuric ATN (Rhabdomyolysis)', 'body': 'Rhabdomyolysis causes ATN through haem pigment direct tubular toxicity and renal vasoconstriction. Early in the course, intense vasoconstriction can produce a paradoxically low RFI (<1), making it resemble pre-renal disease. As tubular damage progresses, the RFI rises above 1. Serum CK >5000 IU/L, urine dipstick positive for blood with few red cells on microscopy, and urine that appears tea or cola coloured are the clinical clues. Aggressive fluid resuscitation (aiming for urine output 200–300 mL/hour) is the primary treatment.'}
Acute Glomerulonephritis
{'title': 'Acute Glomerulonephritis', 'body': 'In acute GN (e.g., IgA nephropathy flare, rapidly progressive GN), proteinuria, haematuria, and hypertension are the dominant features. The glomerular injury causes reduced GFR, but tubular function is often initially intact — resulting in a low RFI (<1) that would suggest pre-renal disease. This is a classic pitfall. Urine microscopy showing dysmorphic red cells and red cell casts immediately raises the suspicion of GN, which should trigger immunological workup (ANCA, anti-GBM, complement levels) rather than fluid resuscitation.'}
Post-Renal Obstruction
{'title': 'Post-Renal Obstruction', 'body': 'In early urinary tract obstruction (hours), tubular sodium reabsorption is preserved and RFI may be <1, mimicking pre-renal disease. As obstruction continues (>24 hours), tubular dysfunction develops and RFI rises above 1. Ultrasound demonstrating hydronephrosis is the definitive diagnostic test for obstruction. Relief of obstruction (catheter, nephrostomy) should be pursued urgently before tubular damage becomes irreversible — the RFI is not the test that drives management here.'}
Aminoglycoside Nephrotoxicity
{'title': 'Aminoglycoside Nephrotoxicity', 'body': 'Aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin) cause ATN by accumulating in proximal tubular cells, with toxicity developing 5–7 days into therapy. Unlike ischaemic ATN, aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity is non-oliguric in early stages and may show a rising creatinine with a urine sodium that is only modestly elevated. RFI may be in the borderline range (1–2). Key clues are the temporal relationship to antibiotic therapy, trough level monitoring, and urinary beta-2 microglobulin (a proximal tubular injury marker) as a more sensitive early indicator.'}
| Index | Formula | Pre-Renal Threshold | ATN Threshold | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFI | UNa / (UCr/PCr) | < 1 | > 1 | Less commonly used; equivalent to FENa |
| FENa (%) | (UNa × PCr) / (PNa × UCr) × 100 | < 1% | > 2% | Preferred; requires plasma Na |
| FEUrea (%) | (UUrea × PCr) / (PUrea × UCr) × 100 | < 35% | > 50% | Best with diuretics on board |
What is the difference between RFI and FENa?
Mathematically, RFI = FENa × (Plasma Na / 100). Since plasma sodium is typically around 140 mEq/L, RFI ≈ 1.4 × FENa. However, the same threshold of 1.0 is used for both (RFI <1 = pre-renal; FENa <1% = pre-renal), so they convey the same diagnostic information. FENa is preferred because it is more widely cited in the medical literature and requires an additional plasma sodium measurement to convert between the two.
Why is FENa preferred over RFI in clinical practice?
FENa was described and validated in earlier landmark studies (Miller et al., 1978) and is more widely taught and referenced. The RFI was developed slightly later (Espinel, 1976) and offers no diagnostic advantage over FENa. Both require identical input variables (urine Na, urine Cr, plasma Cr) except FENa additionally requires plasma Na. In practice, most clinicians and calculators use FENa.
When should I use FEUrea instead of RFI or FENa?
Use FEUrea (fractional excretion of urea, normal <35%) when the patient has received diuretics within the past 24 hours. Urea reabsorption in the proximal tubule is not inhibited by loop diuretics or thiazides, making FEUrea a more reliable marker of tubular function in this setting. FEUrea <35% suggests pre-renal; >50% suggests ATN.
What is the threshold for diagnosing ATN with RFI?
An RFI >1 is the conventional threshold for ATN. However, like all diagnostic indices, there is no perfect cut-off. Values between 1 and 2 are in a grey zone and must be interpreted with clinical context, urine microscopy, and trend of creatinine change. An RFI >2–3 with granular casts on microscopy is strongly suggestive of ATN.
Does RFI work in oliguric versus non-oliguric AKI?
The RFI (and FENa) were originally validated primarily in oliguric AKI. In non-oliguric ATN, tubular sodium reabsorption can be partially preserved, leading to lower FENa/RFI values that may overlap with the pre-renal range. Non-oliguric ATN is generally less severe but can still yield RFI values between 1 and 2. Clinical judgement is essential.
Can RFI be used in CKD patients?
CKD patients have chronically elevated plasma creatinine due to reduced GFR, but the tubular sodium reabsorption pattern in response to acute haemodynamic changes is generally preserved unless there is superimposed tubular damage. The same RFI thresholds apply, though interpretation is complicated by baseline tubular dysfunction in advanced CKD. A trending RFI over serial measurements is more informative than a single value.
What urine microscopy findings complement RFI interpretation?
Muddy brown granular casts and renal tubular epithelial cells on urine microscopy are pathognomonic of ATN and strongly support an RFI >1 diagnosis. Hyaline casts are non-specific and seen in pre-renal states. Red cell casts indicate glomerulonephritis (where RFI/FENa are unreliable). The combination of RFI >1 and granular casts makes ATN highly likely.
Is there an RFI equivalent for contrast nephropathy or myoglobinuria?
No specific modification of the RFI has been validated for these conditions. Contrast nephropathy and myoglobinuric ATN are known to cause falsely low FENa/RFI values because intense renal vasoconstriction preserves some tubular sodium reabsorption early in the injury process. Clinical history, urine colour, CK levels (for myoglobin), and imaging context are the key diagnostic tools in these settings, not urinary indices alone.
プロのヒント
When in doubt between pre-renal and ATN in a patient on diuretics, calculate the fractional excretion of urea instead: FEUrea = (Urine Urea × Plasma Cr) / (Plasma Urea × Urine Cr) × 100. A FEUrea <35% suggests pre-renal despite diuretic use, because tubular urea reabsorption is preserved in volume depletion and is not inhibited by loop diuretics.
ご存知でしたか？
The RFI was first described by Espinel in 1976, just two years before the landmark FENa study by Miller et al. in 1978. Despite being published first, the RFI was largely superseded by FENa in clinical teaching — a reminder that in medicine, the index with the better study design and marketing often wins wider adoption, not necessarily the one that came first.
参考文献
- ›Espinel CH — The FENa test. Use in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. JAMA 1976
- ›Miller TR et al. — Urinary diagnostic indices in acute renal failure. Ann Intern Med 1978
- ›Pepin MN et al. — Diagnostic performance of FENa and FEUrea. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007
- ›UpToDate — Urinary indices in AKI
- ›KDIGO AKI Guidelines 2012