Ramiojo metimo išlaidų skaičiuoklė

The Quiet Quitting Cost Calculator is an executive-grade tool designed to quantify the financial liability of employee disengagement within your organization. Rather than viewing 'quiet quitting' through a social or cultural lens, this calculator treats it as a critical operational risk: a state of passive compliance where salaried professionals meet the bare minimum of their job descriptions while actively withholding discretionary effort, innovation, and collaborative initiative. For CFOs, COOs, and HR leaders, this represents a major, unhedged operational tax that quietly erodes corporate margins. This calculator models the financial drag across two primary risk vectors: direct productivity leakage and voluntary turnover liability. When employees disengage, project velocity slows, customer service quality degrades, and high-performing team members are forced to overcompensate, creating a secondary risk of burnout. Furthermore, disengaged employees present a significantly higher flight risk. When they inevitably depart, the organization must absorb the fully loaded costs of talent acquisition, onboarding overhead, and the productivity ramp-up curve—expenses that routinely reach 1.0x to 2.0x of an employee's annual salary. By converting qualitative engagement surveys (such as eNPS) into hard financial metrics, this tool enables data-driven capital allocation. It allows executives to build mathematically sound business cases for retention strategies, leadership training, and cultural interventions. Instead of presenting abstract morale concerns to the board, you can now present a clear risk-mitigation framework backed by bottom-line dollar figures.

Calkulon makes complex calculations simple — built for students and everyday problem-solvers.

1. 1Step 1 — Identify the specific department or role cohort and enter their average annual fully burdened salary (S).
2. 2Step 2 — Input the estimated or surveyed number of disengaged employees (N) within that cohort.
3. 3Step 3 — Define the estimated productivity deficit (PL), typically modeled between 15% and 30% depending on role complexity.
4. 4Step 4 — Establish the annual voluntary turnover probability (TR) for this disengaged segment.
5. 5Step 5 — Input the replacement cost multiplier (TC) to reflect the true organizational cost of hiring and onboarding a successor.
6. 6Step 6 — The system calculates the direct productivity drain: N × S × PL.
7. 7Step 7 — The system calculates the actuarial turnover risk: N × S × TR × TC.
8. 8Step 8 — Review the aggregated annual loss, monthly burn rate, and per-capita cost to prioritize retention investments.

• !Using unburdened base salaries, which severely underestimates the true financial exposure of turnover and lost productivity.
• !Overlooking the cultural contagion effect, where one disengaged employee's low output forces high performers to overcompensate, leading to burnout.
• !Failing to segment calculations by role criticality, treating easily replaceable administrative positions the same as highly specialized engineering or sales roles.
• !Treating disengagement as an individual disciplinary issue rather than a systemic management or process failure.